BBC

in association
with

BBC

in association
with

Follow the Food

How a 'transfarmation' can help the climate

Christine Ro

In their entirety, food systems are responsible for 23% of greenhouse gas emissions

The bulk comes from agriculture and land use change, such as turning forests into farmland

Which actions could help to reduce farming's emissions the most?

There are a number of ways that agriculture can lessen its environmental impact. Some of these ways you might be familiar with, like reducing food waste or using water sparingly. 

But others might be a little less obvious to consumers, even though their impacts could be far greater. For example, Seaweed Solutions in Portugal are experimenting with seeding kelp forests in the Atlantic Ocean by spraying pebbles with kelp spores and dropping them in the sea. Eventually, these spores will bloom into forests 30m (98ft) high that could provide a source of food, animal feed or medicine and sequester carbon in the process.

Solutions like this sound surprisingly simple, but working out farming's environmental impact can be anything but. Some of the biggest agricultural contributors to climate change are a little less obvious.

One significant source of farming's greenhouse gas emissions comes from land use change, or creating new cropland from natural habitats like forests, peatlands and grassland.

Peat, a thick, dark, gloopy mixture of partially decayed vegetation that accumulates over millennia, is a critical carbon sink. Though they make up only 3% of the world's land, peatlands punch far above their weight when it comes to sequestering carbon. Globally, they store twice as much carbon as all the world's forests, which occupy more than 10 times the area of land.

But when disrupted, this powerful storage system can start spewing carbon dioxide. Agriculture is the main driver for this disruption. If a peat bog is drained of its water, the nutrient-rich soil left behind makes it a perfect environment in which to grow many crops. However, draining the water also enables the stored carbon to be released into the atmosphere. 

In parts of Malaysia, Indonesia and Brunei, it is thought that 90% of peatlands have been disturbed to create agricultural land. Growing populations in Malaysia and Indonesia have raised the demand for more farmland, at the cost of natural peatlands.

Not only is this contributing to more carbon emissions, the dried peatland also becomes inflammable, which has led to hugely lethal peat fires. The polluted haze produced by peat fires in Indonesia during 2015, for example, are estimated to have caused 100,000 premature deaths. 

While peat is no longer commonly mined to be used as a fertiliser in countries like the UK, it is still mined in countries like Canada and Finland. For the same reason it makes good cropland, peat is a desirable additive to soil. In the UK, most peat-based compost is used not by commercial growers, but by amateur gardeners, though this practice might soon be banned. Peat-based compost has many valuable properties: it's versatile and absorbs moisture well, for instance.

Yet despite the climate benefits of peat bogs being kept intact, compost derived from peat bogs, which have traditionally been abundant, remains cheap. "Which is absolutely the wrong way round," Mark Gush, the head of environmental horticulture for the Royal Horticultural Society (RHS), says. 

The RHS is encouraging a move away from peat, while also trialling alternatives. These include sphagnum moss and by-products from other industries like wool production, wine production and forestry. Sheep's wool helps with water retention, for instance. Another replacement product is coir (coconut fibre), although the carbon footprint of processing and transporting coir is higher than for peat.

The need for this is clear. Because peat develops at a glacial pace – it can take thousands of years for peat bogs to form, with an average growth of just 1mm (0.04 inches) a year in some parts of the world – restoring bogs is less useful than simply keeping the peat in the ground in the first place. That's where peat bogs will continue with their slow and vital business of decomposing plant matter, while locking away massive amounts of carbon.

One way to reduce the amount of extra nutrients a farmer has to apply to their crops could be to improve the growing efficiency and yield of the plants. The University of Illinois's Ripe project is experimenting with the way plants photosynthesise to maximise their use of sunlight. In a field of plants, the upper leaves are far more productive than the lower ones as they receive the most light. But if the genetics of a plant could be altered to make its leaves more transparent, the crop might grow more efficiently.

In the video below, Lisa Ainsworth from Ripe explains how she and her colleagues are experimenting with tobacco plants to prove the concept.

Your browser does not support HTML5 video.

00:00 / 00:00

Advertisement
   seconds

Agroforestry, or the integration of forests and farming, has been practised in some form for centuries. With climate change driving more extreme weather, the benefits are mounting for both livestock and crops. 

Trees on agricultural plots reduce landslide risk in China and flooding risk in the UK, for instance. As well, "the right design will provide very good shade for livestock and for crops", says Helen Cheshire, the lead farming advocate for the Woodland Trust, a UK-based conservation charity. "They will help slow the wind and help slow evapotranspiration rates [the combined rate at which water is lost to the atmosphere from the ground and from plants], improving the crop water efficiency. So they act as a bit of an insurance policy against drought." The benefits extend year-round. 

One type of agroforestry, silvopasture, interlaces trees and shrubs with pasture. Such land, including both the trees and the soil beneath the woody biomass, can sequester five to 10 times more carbon. (However, the potential for increasing carbon sequestration depends on the conditions of the site. For instance, it may be less effective in areas that already have large amounts of soil organic carbon.) Because trees are such powerful stores of carbon, their presence on degraded agricultural land makes good use of such land.

The mixture also helps diversify the output of a farm or ranch. The trees can generate other foods like nuts and mushrooms while the livestock graze between the trees.

Southeast Asian countries including Cambodia and Vietnam have traditionally used agrosilvopastoral systems involving rubber, palm trees and acacias. "The systems have the potential to increase forage and wood biomass while promoting income diversification and contributing to food security, the restoration of degraded lands and the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions," explains Sonevilay Nampanya, a livestock development officer for the Food and Agriculture Organization’s Asia and the Pacific Regional Office. But this area remains under-studied.

In the UK, the Woodland Trust is running a pilot scheme supporting farmers to make space for trees, providing site visits, planting designs and follow-up guidance. While there's great interest, it can be challenging for farmers to find the time and navigate the uncertainty of new systems, not to mention the high initial costs.

Nampanya notes that it’s important to select the right tree species that can balance forestry and livestock needs, with local communities heavily involved in landscape design. He also warns of "the risk of zoonotic and vector-borne disease outbreaks" where lots of trees are planted close to forests. 

Yet it doesn't take as long as you might expect for the trees to start paying for themselves, Cheshire says. Within two or three years, there can be visible benefits in terms of reducing soil erosion and providing shelter for livestock. In Panama, ranchers practising silvopasture are seeing higher returns from the more nutrient-rich diet for their cows.

On a broader level, Cheshire says of this approach to agriculture, "Not only has it got the climate benefits, but it's also helping to address the nature crisis", if native tree species are cultivated and plantation-style planting is avoided. "The same trees that are capturing some carbon, and helping the farm to adapt to climate change, are also delivering for nature."

Nurturing trees on farms isn't just about planting trees, which is far from a panacea. Planted trees can hoover up water and intensify drought in dry regions, for instance. Natural forest regeneration – essentially, leaving forested areas alone – can be a cheaper and more effective way to harmonise trees and space for livestock.

"We have to be careful with trees," Cheshire acknowledges. Yet silvopasture remains an underappreciated form of agriculture that, if approached thoughtfully, "can help address a whole wide range of issues and provide a whole wide range of benefits".

Dairy and cattle production releases 37% of global methane emissions, making it one of the biggest agricultural greenhouse gases contributors. While lab-grown low-emission milks and beef could one day feature at our kitchen tables, some dairy producers like Wyke Farms, the UK's largest independent cheese and milk processor, are finding ways to use waste methane for good.

By introducing methanogenic bacteria to farm slurry and dairy waste, Wyke Farms can collect biogas to use as a clean fuel, and the remaining waste can be spread on the fields as an alternative fertiliser. 

While livestock farming can be made more climate-friendly, reducing the amount of animal farming – at least in industrialised countries with intensive animal agriculture operations – will make an enormous difference to greenhouse gas emissions.

Germany's new Commission for the Future of Agriculture has recommended reduced consumption and production of animal products, for example. And elsewhere, other farmers are already taking the initiative. Some transition farmers in the US are even betting on cannabis as a more lucrative alternative to poultry.

Meanwhile, movements like Refarm'd in Europe and the Miyoko's Dairy Farm Conversion Program in California have cropped up to support farmers to move away from animal products. But, overhauling the comparatively stable business model of farming meat, and learning an entirely new system of farming, is challenging.

For Sarah Heiligtag, one of the most difficult aspects of the transition hasn't been technical or financial, but social. In 2013, animal lover Heiligtag and her husband took over a livestock farm in Hinteregg, near Zurich, and turned it into an animal refuge and farm called Hof Narr. They started producing oats for oat milk, tomatoes for passata, and other crops. There are over 100 animals now living on Hof Narr, and thousands of visitors each year. In 2017, the Hof Narr team started helping other Swiss farmers to undertake their own "transfarmations". 

Other farmers have been suspicious of these kinds of projects, Heiligtag explains. The tensions can have a generational edge. "In Switzerland [farmers often] take over from their dads. And if the dad has done this for so many years, and suddenly the son comes along and says 'No, I'm not going to kill any animal, I'm going to do something completely different,' this might be a big issue."

Most of the farmers they've supported have been in their 20s and 30s, suggesting that as farming faces an ageing crisis, innovative models like this could be a way to keep younger generations interested.

Heiligtag estimates that 70% of the farmers they've worked with have been primarily motivated by animal welfare. But this is combined with growing public awareness of climate change. "If you, for example, produce oat milk, it's way more climate positive than cow's milk," says Heiligtag. "You can say 'I don't need to take the calves away from the mum, I'm also doing something good for the climate by changing to oat milk.'"

Heiligtag argues that animal farming in countries like Switzerland has only been relatively stable traditionally because of government subsidies that distort the market, and don't factor in the environmental costs of animal and dairy production. 

Even so, demand for plant-based products is exploding. Heiligtag says some of the diversified produce farms can be more profitable than the previous meat and dairy operations. However, these tend to depend on non-produce income, such as animal sponsorships, farm tours and events. In Heiligtag's vision, "the farm of the future wouldn't do much of this anymore". 

Whatever form it takes, people like Heiligtag call for the focus to be on food for people. "If you do food not feed – the food for the humans on the field, not to fatten up animals – then on a small scale you can feed so many more people," she emphasises. As the population rises along with global temperatures, sustainably producing more food for more people will be a pressing priority.

Credits

  • Pictures (in order of use): Getty Images, Getty Images, Getty Images, Lydia Schrandt/Getty Images, Geraint Rowland/Getty Images, Pradeep Gaur/Getty Images, Frank Bienewald/Getty Images, Mats Silvan/Getty Images
  • Graphic data source: Project Drawdown
  • Words: Christine Ro
  • Editor: William Park

share this story

Follow the Food

Follow the Food is a multimedia series by BBC Future and BBC World News that investigates how agriculture is responding to the profound challenges of climate change, environmental degradation and rapidly growing populations that face our global food supply chains. Follow the Food traces emerging answers to these problems – both high-tech and low-tech, local and global – from farmers, growers and researchers across six continents.

Read More

in association
with

Discover more

The race to improve food security

The way to cut your food’s climate emissions

The foods that reverse climate change

Copyright © 2021 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more

Cookies | Ad Choices / Do Not Sell My Info

Copyright © 2021 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more | Cookies | Ad Choices / Do Not Sell My Info