|
We are not adding any new comments to this page but you can still read some of the comments previously submitted by readers.
Inside Out South Team
Sue, The Inside Out team would very much like to talk to you about this. Could you please contact us at insideout.south@bbc.co.uk
Sue
We parents of people who end their lives in such tragic ways sometimes get a little comfort and support by talking to each other, we all get angry and we all try to make things change but nothing changes and these young and vulnerable people keep on dying.
What is worse is that nobody seems to care- mental health is not sexy. The only time there is any outcry is when some member of the public is harmed by a mental patient, meanwhile the poor patients are dying and until someone like you draws attention to it nobody notices. Are our children less than human, don't their lives matter?
Gary Hughes
The programme focused on the worst possible senarios concerning patients that have absconded. what about those whos lives have been not just bettered, but saved saved by St Anne's?
I went into st annes 8 years ago weighing 4 1/2 stone and geeting worse. St annes saved my life, the staff there were brilliant and deserve praise not negetive critism.
Ray Metcalfe
Inside Out is a superb programme and this item has been one of it's most excellent items. Thank you Chris.
Mrs Bell
I felt compelled to respond to your feature this evening. I myself work within the mental health services, although I feel there are positive changes that can be made to the system, I believe that your feature was incredibly biased and mis informed.
For example, you failed to mention that when service users are on a section, as part of their planned care to be reestablished within the community they are entitled to leave from the ward if it is deemed safe and appropriate to do so.
Towards the end of the feature the presenter made a very flippant comment stating that 2 service users die a week whilst under section due to lack of care!!!! I would be interested to know where the factual information came from for this comment.
This feature continues to reinforce the negative image of mental health, insisting that people should be kept under lock and key. The comments completely undermine the valuable work that I and other mental health professionals try to undertake each day. I hope that in the future your features may be more balanced and representative of the wider community.
Anonymous
The vast majority of people detained on a section (including sections 2 & 3 the most common)have 'Section 17 Leave' granted by their consultant. This entitles them walk off the ward (after signing a piece of paper) for a set period of time each day. This idea that there are 'sectioned' patients 'escaping' and running riot all over the country is ridiculous.
If a person without leave DOES abscond, (which is rare, and normally due to a technicality such as them not signing out) then the police are always contacted immediatly, and they then begin a search for that person. Staff cannot normally be permitted to leave the ward themselves for reasons of safety.
My sympathies go out to the families of those who have lost their loved ones due to a mental illness. Safety is of course always paramount and detailed risk assessments are always carried out before leave is granted. A balance between protecting people and maintaining patient's human rights is always strived for.
People are always detained in the least restrictive environment possible in order to improve their chances of getting better. Unfortunately things sometimes go wrong, risk assessment is not an exact science. These people are human beings, it is vital that we started treating them as such.
Simon Walker
Your program was an over-dramatised simplification of what is an extremely complex set of issues. Confinement versus treatment in a relatively open environment is the crux of the problem facing those who treat mentally ill patients.
If we were to lock up all those who have been sectioned, then the accusation of returning to a Victorian-type ethos would be levelled. We could, as a society, of course return to a "lock them all up" policy. Is this really what we seek ... and what about Human Rights?
|